quic-issues/427e7578-d7bf-49c8-aee9-2dd999e25316
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

README.md aktualisiert

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
T.homas
2026-03-15 22:02:13 +00:00
parent fc5f47cf25
commit 4a594269f5
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
README.md
View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ The possiblity to generate lots of users that do a lot of things (at a rather lo
The possibility to put out wrong data, maby not even contradicting but additional to existing data. The possibility to put out wrong data, maby not even contradicting but additional to existing data.
The possibility to do all kinds of shenenigans like spam other users with some requests The possibility to do all kinds of shenenigans like spam other users with some requests
Due to low programming knowledge, the starting point of this proposal was to mirror how normal groups of people solve issues of trust to then automate and possibly improve the process. There are already some systems out there like Trust flow or random walk.As far as i understand it, the Flexible Trust Web also already does something like this, also maby RWOT and GNUweb but i didn't read into them too much since i discovered them rather late. Due to low programming knowledge, the starting point of this proposal was to mirror how normal groups of people solve issues of trust to then automate and possibly improve the process. There are already some systems out there like Trust flow or random walk.As far as i understand it, the Flexible Trust Web also already does something like this, also maby RWOT and GNUweb but i didn't read into them too much yet since i discovered them rather late.
If random new people should be able to use the system as equals to previous users, but the system never has real identities as an input, then there is no way to fully prevent the creation of new users to manipulate or sabotage the poll. But it can be assumed, that your friends are rather trustworthy and most likely also their friends and so on. And if someone makes huge ammounts or just one second account, they will probably only have the creator or maby some other people as friends, and even they might already be less socially connected than a normal user. If random new people should be able to use the system as equals to previous users, but the system never has real identities as an input, then there is no way to fully prevent the creation of new users to manipulate or sabotage the poll. But it can be assumed, that your friends are rather trustworthy and most likely also their friends and so on. And if someone makes huge ammounts or just one second account, they will probably only have the creator or maby some other people as friends, and even they might already be less socially connected than a normal user.
So the social distance to another user should be evaluated to see, whether you should count their vote. So the social distance to another user should be evaluated to see, whether you should count their vote.