quic-issues/427e7578-d7bf-49c8-aee9-2dd999e25316
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

t.homas-patch-1 #2

Closed
T.homas wants to merge 3 commits from T.homas/427e7578-d7bf-49c8-aee9-2dd999e25316:t.homas-patch-1 into proposal-c3a5326a-9c65-4bcf-9425-8233dfa9fe78
pull from: T.homas/427e7578-d7bf-49c8-aee9-2dd999e25316:t.homas-patch-1
merge into: quic-issues:proposal-c3a5326a-9c65-4bcf-9425-8233dfa9fe78
Conversation 2 Commits 3 Files Changed 1 +1 -1
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit fc5f47cf25 - Show all commits

2
README.md
View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Due to low programming knowledge, the starting point of this proposal was to mir
If random new people should be able to use the system as equals to previous users, but the system never has real identities as an input, then there is no way to fully prevent the creation of new users to manipulate or sabotage the poll. But it can be assumed, that your friends are rather trustworthy and most likely also their friends and so on. And if someone makes huge ammounts or just one second account, they will probably only have the creator or maby some other people as friends, and even they might already be less socially connected than a normal user. If random new people should be able to use the system as equals to previous users, but the system never has real identities as an input, then there is no way to fully prevent the creation of new users to manipulate or sabotage the poll. But it can be assumed, that your friends are rather trustworthy and most likely also their friends and so on. And if someone makes huge ammounts or just one second account, they will probably only have the creator or maby some other people as friends, and even they might already be less socially connected than a normal user.
So the social distance to another user should be evaluated to see, whether you should count their vote. So the social distance to another user should be evaluated to see, whether you should count their vote.
This is evaluated for and by every user individually, based on the information they were sent. The ammount of contacts you won't count are displayed to you, such that you get a hint at how many people you are missing but also how many people are not counting you. This encourages people to try to prove others/vise versa and make social connections to officially tie the network closer together such that the voting system works and confirms itself. It would be great, if there was some chat attached to the poll. If people want to prove their (or others) trusworhiness within this system, they are then also encouraged to have productive discussions, probably about the matter of the poll. This is evaluated for and by every user individually, based on the information they were sent. The ammount of contacts you won't count are displayed to you, such that you get a hint at how many people you are missing but also how many people are not counting you. This encourages people to try to prove others/vise versa and make social connections to officially tie the network closer together such that the voting system works and confirms itself. It would be great, if there was some chat attached to the poll. If people want to prove their (or others) trustworhiness within this system, they are then also encouraged to have productive discussions, probably about the matter of the poll.
Everyone in a poll with you is a "contact" of yours. Everyone in a poll with you is a "contact" of yours.
"users" can have "friends". "users" can have "friends".
You can also manually mark users as suspicious or trustworthy or normal again. You can also manually mark users as suspicious or trustworthy or normal again.